Contribution of Teaching Practices on Pupils Academic Performance in Public Primary Schools in Kenya

Oronda Wesonga William, Nganyi Jason, Epari Ejakait

Abstract


The study examined the contributions of various teaching practices on learners' academic performance in public primary schools in Nambale Sub-County, Kenya. Using a descriptive survey design, the research focused on timely syllabus coverage, frequent homework assignments, and regular testing as key teaching practices. Data was collected via questionnaires and analyzed thematically for qualitative data and using linear regression for quantitative data. The findings revealed that teaching and learning practices significantly influenced academic achievement in the schools studied, with regular testing being particularly significant. Additionally, the study concluded that most schools managed timely syllabus coverage. The recommendations included a call for government policy review to enhance teaching and learning practices and ultimately improve academic performance

Keywords: Teaching and learning practices; syllabus coverage; assignments; testing; performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeyaju J.L, (1987); Creativity learning and learning styles. Isola Ola & Sons: Zaria.

Baines, L. (2007) Learning from the world, achieving more by doing less. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 98 - 100.

Bembenutty, H. (2011). The last word: An interview with Harris Cooper-research, policies, tips, and current perspectives on homework. Journal of advanced academics, 22(2),340-349.

Bennett, S., & Kalish, N. (2006). The case against homework: Homework is hurting our children and what we can do about it. Crown polishers.

Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black books. Raising Standards through classroom evaluation. Phi Delta Kappanhttp://www.pdkin.org.Retrivedon 11th Jan 2012.

Bloom, B.S(1980): “All our children learning”. McGraw. Hill.

Bloom, B.S(1982): Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw, 261pp.

Bryan, T. et al, (1998). Teachers selected strategies for improving

homework completion. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 263-275.

Cooper, H. (1989) Synthesis of research on homework. Education Leadership, 47, 85-91.

Cooper, H. & Valentine, J. C (2001) Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologists, 36, 143 - 153

Cooper, et al, (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987 – 2003.Review of Educational Research, 76, 1 –62.

Court D, GhaiD (Eds) (1984): Education society and development: new perspectives from Kenya

Crooks, T, J. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students” Review of Educational Research, 1988, 58(4), 438 – 481.

De Jong, et al, (2000) Homework and math’s achievement in Junior high school. Educational Research & Evaluation, 6, 130 – 157.

Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revision Assessment Through a children’s rights Approach. Implications for policy process and practice. Research Paper in Education, 25(3), 335-353 Routledge.

Ernest P (1999): Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics: Radical constructivism.

Eshiwani, G.S(1983): Factors Influencing Achievement in Primary and Secondary School Student in Western Province of Kenya. (Bureau of Education Research, Nairobi).

Epstein, et al, (2001) more than minutes: Teacher’s role in designing homework. Educational Psychologists 36, 181 – 193.

Farrant, J. S (1980): Principles and Practices of Education; Pearson Education Limited. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex England.

Gonida, E.N., & Cortina, K.S. (2014). Parental involvement in homework: Relations with parent and student achievement – related motivational beliefs and achievement. British journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 376-396. doi: 10. iiii/bjep.12039.

Grunert, J. (1997). The course syllabus: A learning Centred approach. Bolton, MA: Anker publishing company.

Handrick, R (1998): Changing Schools by Changing Teaching and learning. State of Michgan. Hirst, et al, (2011): Transition to primary; A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from: www.kidsmatter.Educ.Au.

Hoy et al (2000): Improving Quality in Education. London Falmer Press, England 388pp. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nded.). Cambridge University Press.

Jemison, M (1997): The development of higher psychological practices. Cambridge. Harvard university press.

Kenya National Examinations Council – KNEC (2010). The Report on Monitoring learner achievement. A study for class three in Literacy and Numeracy. Nairobi, Kenya; Kenya National Examination Council.

Karaka, K (2007): Effective teaching in school. Oxford University press.

Keith, T. (1982) Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large sample path analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology; 74, 248 – 253.

Kunari, C (2006); Methods of teaching educational technology.

Kombo and Tromp (2006): Proposal and Thesis writing. Pauline’s nation Africa. G.P.O Kenya.

Ishiyama, et al, (2002) Does the wording of syllabi affect student course assessment in class? Political Science & Politics.35, 3pp. 567-570

Littlefield, V.M (1991). My syllabus? Teaching and learning in Higher Education, Calgary.

Lugayila, C.P.N(2002): Assessment on the District Rural Development Programme (DRDP), Initiative to improve Quality in Primary Education. A case study of Kahama District. Dissertation for Award of M.A (ED) Degree at University of Dar-es-Salam. 159pp.

Maiyo, J.A (2009). “Factors contributing to poor achievement in Kenya Certificate of Primary Education in Schools in Mwimbi, Division Maara District, Kenya’’. Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega.

Matejka, K, and L. Kurke (1994), Designing a great syllabus. College teaching 4 (3): 115-117.

Mbithi, D.M (1974): Foundation of School Administration. Oxford University Press.

Mc Daniel, E. (1994). Understanding Educational Measurement’s; Brown & Benchmark. Mc Keachie, W.J. Teaching Tips. (8thed.) Lexington, mass; Heath, 1986.

Mc. Mohon, M (1997): Social Constructivism and the World Wide Web-A Paradigm of Learning. Paper presented at the ASCILITE Conference. Perth, Australia. Ministry of Education Science and Technology. Kenya.

Ministry of Education – MOE (2010). Summative evaluation of the primary school education curriculum. Kenya Institute of Education.

Mugenda and Mugenda (2003): Research Methods Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.

Omwonyo, R. (2003): Primary science and teaching handbook. Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.

Orodho, J.A. (2009): Elements of Educational and Social Sciences Research Method.

Orodho, J (2013): Focus on Strategies Applied to Cope with School Based Challenges Inhibiting Effecting Implementation of the Curriculum. Basic education in Kenya

Otiato, O. P., (2009): Quality of Education and its Role in National Development. A Case Study of Kenya’s Education Reforms; Kenya Studies Review.1, 1,133-149.

Parkes, J. & Harris, M.B. (2002). The purpose of a syllabus. College teaching, 50 (2), 55-61.

Paschal, R.A, Weinstein, T. & Walberg, H.J (2001). The effect of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Education Research, 78, 97-104.

Psacharopolus, G: and Woodhall, M (1997): Education for Development and Analysis of Investment Choice. Oxford University Press.

Republic of Kenya (2005): Sessional Paper No. 1 on Policy Reforms for Education, Training And Research: Meeting the Challenges of Education Training and Research in the 21st Century.

Republic of Kenya (2012). Sessional Paper No.14 of 2012 on realigning education and trainingthe Constitution of Kenya 2010 and Vision 2030 and beyond.

Rolleston, C. (2009). The determination of Exclusion: Evidence from Ghana living Standard Survey. Rousseau J (1778): Nature of children, Frankfurt Peter Lang.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

SEREK publication https://serek.or.ke

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License